Opinion Maker: World Intelligence Agencies Call Obama’s ‘Birth Certificate’ a Blatant Forgery

Even if this is true I am sure that we’ll not be hearing any official statements from foreign intelligence agencies any time soon with respect to the veracity of Obama’s recent ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ release.  It wouldn’t be politically expedient.  Regardless, it seems to me that this release is having the opposite effect than the pro-Obama naysayers envisioned:  instead of dousing the flame of the ‘Birther’ movement and the upcoming release of Jerome  R. Corsi’s book (the Trump machine notwithstanding), this release has done nothing but add fuel to the fire.

On one hand, Obama supporters will proclaim this document as real and absolute proof that he was born in the US.  On the other hand, ‘Birthers’ will see this as proof that Obama continues to lie and conceal facts surrounding the true nature of his status.  And some of those in between who were not ‘Birthers’ before this past week are forced to raise an eyebrow or two, seeing good reason to give credence to the movement now more than ever before…

By Wayne Madsen – “From intelligence agencies around the world, the verdict on President Obama’s newly-released certificate of live birth from Hawaii is in: the certificate is a rank forgery on the same level as the Niger ‘yellow cake’ uranium and Iraq Oil Ministry forged documents. Intelligence and law enforcement services are experts on fake documents since they have to deal with large numbers of counterfeit documents, such as birth certificates, passports, identity cards and driver’s licenses, as well as currency. Intelligence agencies are also experts at forging their own documents for their clandestine agents.

Within 24-hours of the release of the long form Certificate of Live Birth on April 27, intelligence agencies from Britain and China to Germany and Russia examined the document and concluded it was a forgery based on the fact that Barack H. Obama Sr.’s race, listed as ‘African,’ was a monumental error, considering that not only the United States, but other English-speaking nations described Africans and those of African descent as either ‘Negroes’ or ‘blacks’ in 1961.”  Read more.