Home > Radical Islam > The Law Of “Allah” Hath Spoken: Iran Sentences Christians To 80 Lashes For Taking Communion

The Law Of “Allah” Hath Spoken: Iran Sentences Christians To 80 Lashes For Taking Communion

Yes, 80. According to Muslims, taking communion in remembrance of Christ’s “it-didn’t-even-happen” sacrifice on the “it’s-an-evil-symbol” cross is grievous enough as it is, but to do so with wine? Boy, that’ll leave them seeing red. Which begs the question: What in “Allah’s name” will they do about all those rivers of wine in Mohammed’s glorious “paradise”? Contradictions. Where would Islam be without them? …

Qur’an Sura 47:15, “A similitude of the Garden which those who keep their duty (to Allah) are promised: Therein are rivers of water unpolluted … and rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers.”

What lashing done in the name of "Allah" the most ungracious and unmerciful is like

What lashing done in the name of “Allah” the most ungracious and unmerciful is like

By Benjamin Weinthal, Fox News – “Four Iranian Christians were reportedly sentenced to 80 lashes for drinking wine for communion, a shocking punishment meted out even as a new United Nations report blasted the Islamic republic for its systematic persecution of non-Muslims.

The four men were sentenced Oct. 6 after being arrested in a house church last December and charged with consuming alcohol in violation of the theocracy’s strict laws, according to Christian Solidarity Worldwide. They were among several Christians punished for their faith in a nation where converting from Islam to Christianity can bring the death penalty. According to a new October UN report by Ahmed Shaheed, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Iran, such persecution is common, despite new President Hasan Rouhani’s pledge to be a moderate.

‘At least 20 Christians were in custody in July 2013,’ Shaheed wrote. ‘In addition, violations of the rights of Christians, particularly those belonging to evangelical Protestant groups, many of whom are converts, who proselytize to and serve Iranian Christians of Muslim background, continue to be reported.’

Iran’s regime has made stopping the spread of Christianity a cornerstone of its crackdown on religious freedom. There are estimated to be as many as 370,000 Christians in Iran, according to the most recent U.S. State Department report. The clerical rulers see Christianity as a threat to Iran’s majority ultra-orthodox Shiite Islamic religion.

‘Despite the recent Iranian charm offensive, Dr. Shaheed’s report reminds us of the true nature of the Iranian regime where the abuse of human rights continue,’ Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), chairman and founder of the Iran Dissident Awareness Program, told FoxNews.com.

‘Political prisoners like blogger Mohammad  Reza Pourshajari are being denied adequate medical care,  journalists and their families continue to be targets of the regime, Pastor Saeed Abedini and Amir Hekmati are still languishing in prison and the Baha’i community faces increasing persecution. This is the true nature of the regime we’re dealing with during negotiations in Geneva.’

Alireza Miryousefi,a spokesman for Iran’s mission to the UN, did not respond to requests for comment, but Iran’s government blasted Dr. Shaheed’s report as not objective. According to Iran’s state-controlled news outlet Press TV, an Iranian official from the UN mission said Shaheed ‘has not paid sufficient notice to Iran’s legal system and Islamic culture and considers whatever he sees in the West as an international standard for the entire world.’

Shaheed is widely considered to be one of the world’s leading authorities on human rights. He served as the minister of foreign Affairs of the Republic of Maldives.

‘It should be no surprise that Iran’s human rights record as documented by the UN is nothing short of atrocious,’ Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told FoxNews.com. ‘If the regime thinks that its international charm offensive will help whitewash its appalling human rights record as documented by the UN report, they are sorely mistaken.'” Read more.

Unsealed: A Closer Look At Revelation 6 And ‘The Four Horsemen Of The Apocalypse’ – “John describes the rider of the Black Horse in Revelation 6:5 as having ‘scales’ or ‘balances’ in his hands, employing the Greek word ‘zygos‘ which is also used metaphorically to refer to any sort of ‘burden’ or ‘bondage’ as well as the imposition of ‘troublesome laws’. Not only is inequality rampant in the Islamic world where Muslim men are considered superior to women and all non-Muslims in general, Islam is also a works-based system whereby ‘Allah’ weighs the ‘good and bad deeds’ of Muslims on a scale to determine who earns entry into Heaven and who does not. In every facet of daily life a Muslim’s conduct must be based upon a strict set of Islamic laws, called the Sharia, and anyone failing to follow ‘Allah’s’ burdensome edicts must suffer draconian punishments, non-Musims included.” Read more.

  1. surj1936
    10/24/2013 at 7:34 PM

    And who said the islam is a cult of peace ? Just see http://www.thereligionofpeace.com


  2. 10/24/2013 at 8:02 PM

    AND, this is what Obama and he U.N. consider “appropriate” for Christians…right!


  3. 10/24/2013 at 11:14 PM

    The nations of Islam; murder, rape, torture, and blasphemy against the GOD of Jacob are their national sports.


  4. 10/28/2013 at 10:05 AM

    The picture is bogus, Mel Gibson’s movie make-up from the Passion of the Christ, taken from the 9th one in: http://www.moviestillsdb.com/movies/the-passion-of-the-christ-i335345/


    • ICA
      10/28/2013 at 10:59 AM

      Hi Ron, thank you for your comment. The photo may be from the Passion of the Christ, but if you Google Sharia lashing punishments it isn’t much different.


  5. Anonymous
    12/15/2019 at 8:49 AM

    I’m Islam and they deserve it because in the Quran it says who ever is Islam converts to Cristin will be sentenced to 80 lashes


    • ICA
      12/15/2019 at 11:20 AM

      Hi anonymous, what Arabic version of the Qur’an do you read? Warsh? Qalun? Hafs? Al-Duri? Khalaf? Or something different? With multiple Arabic versions containing thousands of textual variances (eg. words, phrases, meanings, diacritical marks), what convinces you that the version you read has not been corrupted like all the others?


  1. 10/24/2013 at 8:01 PM

The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of MidnightWatcher's Blogspot. Although differences of opinion are welcomed, please refrain from personal attacks and inappropriate language. This blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments that fail to do so.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: