Home > Anything Else, Radical Islam > How ‘Religious Defamation’ Laws Would Ban Islam

How ‘Religious Defamation’ Laws Would Ban Islam


The Catch-22 here is that Islamists would then accuse you of defaming Islam if you tried to enforce a law prohibiting the defamation of any religion upon Islam itself. And judging from the decrepit and frightened response we’ve been seeing from the West recently, many would still choose to agree. Because Muslims don’t need to abide by any set of rules outside of Islamic jurisprudence. They just need to enforce them …

By Raymond Ibrahim – “As the Islamic world, in the guise of the 57-member state Organization of Islamic Cooperation, continues to push for the enforcement of ‘religious defamation’ laws in the international arena—theoretically developed to protect all religions from insult, but in reality made for Islam—one great irony is lost, especially on Muslims: if such laws would ban movies and cartoons that defame Islam, they would also, by logical extension, have to ban the religion of Islam itself—the only religion whose core texts actively defame other religions.

To understand this, consider what ‘defamation’ means.  Typical dictionary-definitions include ‘to blacken another’s reputation’ and ‘false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another, as by slander or libel.’ In Muslim usage, defamation simply means anything that insults or offends Islamic sensibilities.

However, to gain traction among the international community, the OIC maintains that such laws should protect all religions from defamation, not just Islam.  Accordingly, the OIC is agreeing that any expression that ‘slanders’ the religious sentiments of others should be banned.

What, then, do we do with Islam’s core religious texts—beginning with the Quran itself, which slanders, denigrates and blackens the reputation of other religions?  Consider Christianity alone: Quran 5:73 declares that ‘Infidels are they who say Allah is one of three,’ a reference to the Christian Trinity; Quran 5:73 says ‘Infidels are they who say Allah is the Christ, [Jesus] son of Mary’; and Quran 9:30 complains that ‘the Christians say the Christ is the son of Allah … may Allah’s curse be upon them!’

Considering that the word infidel (or kafir) is one of Islam’s most derogatory terms, what if a Christian book or Western movie appeared declaring that ‘Infidels are they who say Muhammad is the prophet of God—may God’s curse be upon  them‘?  If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the Quran defames Christians and Christianity.

Similarly, consider how the Christian Cross, venerated among millions, is depicted—is defamed—in Islam:  according to canonical hadiths, when he returns, Jesus supposedly will destroy all crosses; and Muhammad, who never allowed the cross in his presence, ordered someone wearing a cross to ‘take off that piece of idolatry.’

What if Christian books or Western movies declared that the sacred things of Islam—say the Black Stone in the Ka’ba of Mecca—are ‘idolatry’ and that Muhammad himself will return and destroy them?  If Muslims would consider that defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the hadith defames the Christian Cross.

Here is a particularly odious form of defamation against Christian sentiment, especially to the millions of Catholic and Orthodox Christians.  According to Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes, including the revered Ibn Kathir, Muhammad is in paradise married to and having sex with the Virgin Mary.

What if a Christian book or Western movie portrayed, say, Muhammad’s wife, Aisha the ‘Mother of Believers,’ as being married to and having sex with a false prophet in heaven?  If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes defame the Virgin Mary.

Nor does such defamation of Christianity occur in Islam’s ancient texts only; modern day Muslim scholars and sheikhs agree that it is permissible to defame Christianity.  Qatar-based ‘Islam Web’ even issued a fatwa that legitimizes insulting Christianity.

Now consider the wording used by Muslim leaders calling on the U.N. to enforce religious defamation laws in response to the Muhammad film on YouTube, and how these expressions can easily be used against Islam:

The OIC ‘deplored… an offensive and derogatory film on the life of Prophet Muhammad’ and ‘called on the producers to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred by Muslims and those of other faiths.’

But what about the ‘offensive and derogatory’ depictions of Christianity in Islam’s core texts?  Are Muslims willing to expunge these from the Quran and hadith, ‘to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred … by those of other faiths,’ in this case, Christians?

Turkish Prime Minister Erodgan said the film ‘insults religions‘ (note the inclusive plural) and called for ‘international legal regulations against attacks on what people [not just Muslims] deem sacred.’

Well, what about the fact that Islam ‘insults religions’—including Judaism and all polytheistic religions?  Should the West call for ‘international legal regulations against attacks on what people deem sacred,’ in the case of Christianity, regulations against Islam’s teachings which attack the sanctity of Christ’s divinity, the Cross, and Virgin Mary?

Even Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti—who a few months ago called for the destruction of all Christian churches in the Arabian Peninsula (first reported here)—is calling for a ‘global ban on insults targeting all‘ religious figures, while the Grand Imam of Egypt’s Al Azhar is calling for ‘a U.N. resolution outlawing ‘insulting symbols and sanctities of Islam’ and other religions.’ Again, they, too, claim to be interested in banning insults to all religions, while ignoring the fact that their own religion is built atop insulting all other religions.

And surely this is the grandest irony of all: the ‘defamation’ that Muslims complain about—and that prompts great violence and bloodshed around the world—revolves around things like movies and cartoons, which are made by individuals who represent only themselves; on the other hand, Islam itself, through its holiest and most authoritative texts, denigrates and condemns—in a word, defames—all other religions, not to mention calls for violence against them (e.g., Quran 9:29).

It is this issue, Islam’s perceived ‘divine’ right to defame and destroy, that the international community should be addressing—not silly cartoons and films.” Source – FrontPageMag.com.

  1. Mike
    09/26/2012 at 3:42 PM

    If Muslims really want to be consistent in removing insults from other religions, they can start by removing the Dome of the Rock.

    Also, remember that (Rev 12:11) “…they overcame him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life even when faced with death.”

    The adversary knows that the word of our testimony of Jesus is a powerful weapon against evil. He knows it is the weapon that overcomes his attempts to sway us from Christ, to take the identifying mark or characteristic that distinguishes those who follow him and those who follow Jesus. If free speech is allowed to be taken away, on any pretext, then our ability to use the word of our testimony of Jesus is greatly lessened. Don’t let them convince you it’s about insulting religions. It’s about removing the Christian testimony, which itself is an insult to Islam.

    Like

  2. ICA
    09/26/2012 at 4:03 PM

    Mike, “If Muslims really want to be consistent in removing insults from other religions, they can start by removing the Dome of the Rock.”

    They could also start be removing dozens of verses from the Qur’an and Hadith. But that would be blasphemous, punishable by death.

    Mike, “Don’t let them convince you it’s about insulting religions. It’s about removing the Christian testimony, which itself is an insult to Islam.”

    Yes indeed, truth is an insult to lies.

    Like

  3. 09/26/2012 at 4:33 PM

    This madness can be explained with only one word…. Satan

    Like

    • 12/28/2012 at 7:18 AM

      I think the madness lay in religious fanaticism, not one religious group over another. When two sides insist on enforcing ‘gods’ and religious traditions on each other, and exchange labels of ‘satan’ and other assorted insults, seething hatred and bloodshed will always ensue. Where did the maturity of adults go?

      Like

  4. iamnotashamedofthegospelofchrist
    09/26/2012 at 8:20 PM

    AMEN!

    Like

  5. iamnotashamedofthegospelofchrist
    09/26/2012 at 11:11 PM

    http://www.latinospost.com/articles/4598/20120926/ahmadinejad-un-general-assembly-2012-live-transcript-united-nations-review-recap-video.htm Talk about defamation! He just told the world at the UN that the mahdi and their jesus was coming back to straighten out the world!

    Like

  6. 01/04/2013 at 6:27 PM

    It’s all such a sad and pathetic joke. I’d rather see religions banned than the strangling of freedom of speech.

    Like

  1. 09/28/2012 at 7:03 AM

The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of MidnightWatcher's Blogspot. Although differences of opinion are welcomed, please refrain from personal attacks and inappropriate language. This blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments that fail to do so.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: