Home > Anything Else > Photographic Evidence Suggests Obama’s ‘Birth Announcement’ Microfilm Reels Have Been Tampered With

Photographic Evidence Suggests Obama’s ‘Birth Announcement’ Microfilm Reels Have Been Tampered With


Honolulu Advertiser, May 5, 1961, Birth Announcements

Honolulu Advertiser, May 5, 1961, Birth Announcements

BY PAMELA BARNETT, The Western Center for Journalism – “This article was produced as the result of research presented in the newly released Amazon e-book Obama Never Vetted: Unlawful President, The National Security Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America, and poses two important issues:

• Barack Obama’s ‘birth announcement’ Microfilm has been tampered with, according to photographic evidence.

• Original Obama ‘birth announcement’ newspapers sold for a high price. If Obama’s name was in those papers, why hasn’t someone come forward with the newspapers?

… Regarding the microfilms, it has to be established that even if the Obama birth announcements were actually in the newspapers, it does not prove a Hawaii birth. Hawaii parents are/were able to file birth documents in Hawaii as long as they were residents, regardless of the actual birth place of the child. Additionally, no proof was required of the birth; only a written statement had to be made. Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961, and other subsequent Hawaii birth laws that allow registration with no proof, or allow Foreign Birth registration, leaves an opening to claim Hawaii ‘birth’ without it being true. In 1961, once a birth document was filed with the Hawaii Department of Health (including those situations mentioned above as well as from the hospitals), the HDOH automatically issued birth announcements to the Hononlulu Advertiser and Star Bulletin.

People that believe Obama was born in Hawaii typically rely on the microfilm printouts of the ‘alleged’ Obama birth announcements from The Honolulu Star Advertiser and Star Bulletin. Talking heads like Bill O’Reilly pose foolish, illogical questions like ‘Are we supposed to believe that Obama’s mother planted the birth certificate in 1961 in Hawaii because she wanted Obama to be President?’ Maybe a better question would be ‘How many people from other countries come here illegally to specifically have their children born here so they can obtain U.S. citizenship?

However, none of the alleged more prominent journalists/talking heads, like O’Reilly and Chris Matthews (being the most prominent and most arrogant on the subject), have ever tried to find the original newspapers to confirm whether the microfilms are authentic. They just accepted what was fed to them by the Obama administration.” Read more.

Flashback: Israeli Science Website: Obama Birth Certificate Is Forged, ‘Should Raise Great Concern About The Suitability Of’ Obama As President - “Israel Science and Technology, the national database and directory of science and technology-related websites in Israel, has published an article asserting the long-form birth certificate released by the White House is a forged document. The website was created by a former science adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel Hanukoglu, Ph.D… The website says that the White House’s release of the Obama document in April 2011, after years of controversy, ‘raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document.’ The website conducted an independent analysis and cites others who came to the same conclusion. The website says the publication ‘of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.’” Read more.

About these ads
  1. coffeeandsleeplessnights
    11/08/2012 at 9:15 PM
  2. Y A Newsome
    11/09/2012 at 4:57 AM

    The paper you show says May 1961. Obama’s b’day is August????

    • ICA
      11/09/2012 at 12:13 PM

      It’s an example of a newspaper from Hawaii in 1961. You’ll need to click the “Read more” link at the end of the post to fully understand the context it is being used in.

  3. 11/09/2012 at 7:22 PM

    Reblogged this on .

  4. 11/10/2012 at 12:25 AM

    Reblogged this on newjerusalemcoming and commented:
    TRANSPARENCY, RIGHT!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of MidnightWatcher's Blogspot. Although differences of opinion are welcomed, please refrain from personal attacks and inappropriate language. This blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments that fail to do so.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 13,224 other followers

%d bloggers like this: